- In 2005, the homicide rate in the US was 5.6.
- In 2011, it was 4.8. It has been steadily declining since 1991.
- In 2010, the international homicide rate was 6.9. For Europe, 3.5.
That figure for the murder rate in Europe is misleading, as it is skewed by the terrible murder rate of 15 for Russia.
The number for the UK is 1.17, making the US over four times more dangerous. Even safer are Spain (0.87), Germany (0.86), Norway (0.60) & Iceland (0.31)
In fact, the Western European state with the murder rate closest to the US is the tiny Principality of Liechtenstein, with 2.8 for its 35,000 people - still only just over half the average for the entire USA
Stumbled across this post, detailing the process of how the author creates (and filters) startup ideas. Which is pretty interesting, but not of direct relevance to me as I have one startup idea, and just want to make that work, not create more!
However of even greater interest was the planning worksheet that he uses. Fortunately. a commenter pointed me to the Business Model Generation website, which created the worksheet.
Their resources include a hosted shared worksheet, a free PDF download (available here), and an iPad app. The iPad app is a bit steep (£20), but i eventually bit the bullet and bought it, and I’ll let you know how I get on.
Jon Stokes points out a critical infrastructure flaw in NYC that looks to be a gift to terrorists.
Some time ago I posted about what I considered was the untapped relationship-marketing potential of Formula 1, steeped as it continued to be in the world of free-to-air television and its somewhat retro business model.
So… Free-to-web is going to replace Free-to-air. And that’s ‘progress’?
In that case give me ‘retro’ any day.
Yesterday HP announced that it was killing of its WebOS-based phone and tablet products. It has also said that it will keep WebOS alive (in other areas), but, since HP doesn’t licence WebOS to any other mobile hardware manufacturers, if is clear that WebOS is dead as far as the mobile space is concerned.
Some bloggers have tried to hand the credit (if one can call it so, as I think this leaves the mobile space considerably poorer) to Apple, and the difficulty in matching the iPad and iPhone. And certainly Apple’s cost-effectiveness in production is a problem for its rivals to overcome in the short term, but I don’t think a company the size of HP would regard it as insuperable.
No, I believe that Android, not the iPad or iPhone, killed WebOS.
My reason is that Google is clearly determined to pour billions into Android (another $12.5 billion this week alone), without trying to make any money out of it, or indeed having any direct revenue. Their strategy widely believed to be one of building a ring of defences around Google’s multi-billion advertising business (see The Freight Train That Is Android), by giving away Android for free and making no money out of it. How can anyone compete with that?
HP took the long view and realised that, unless you have a lot of mobile software patents (Microsoft makes more money from Android than Windows Phone 7), there is no point of even bothering to try to compete in the mobile OS market.
This provides a great example of how Google (contrary to its recent protestations) is actually stifling competition and innovation (and free isn’t always good).

We have a society where almost half the eligible population feel that there is no point in voting - that the mechanisms that run our country have nothing to do with them. For certain age groups, such as the young, that proportion becomes the majority. So why do most young people feel that there is no point in voting, that there is no point in expressing their point of view about how the world around them works?
The answer is simply that our political parties do not reflect what the young think or believe. And that comes about because the voting system allows our political parties to ignore huge chunks of the electorate. One of the points that I made during the AV campaign was that our current voting system shuts out sections of our society - minorities, but large minorities nonetheless.
Once you have a large group of disaffected, energetic people, conflict becomes inevitable. All it needs is a trigger. Of course, if you were to ask the rioters about the underlying cause of the trouble they would be highly unlikely to identify the political system. Which is because these people have stopped thinking of the political system as being even vaguely relevant to them (assuming they ever did, which is highly unlikely).
Voting reform was voted down by the 28.5% of the population who had a vested interest in keeping a system that works (very) well for them. The political parties (one in particular) wheeled out the block vote of their core supporters to protect the interests of the parties themselves (which, intriguingly, involved their supporters voting against their own interests as voters). With our political systems remaining locked down by a self-interested minority, that many, many people feel shut out and excluded is inevitable.
Someone who has a vested interested in society doesn’t attack it. Those who are rioting are disconnected from the rest of us, disconnected from the results of their actions, disconnected from their neighbours. Disconnection isn’t a new thing - there have always been disaffected groups in any society, and teens inherently disconnect - however unrest of the scale that we’ve seen this week, especially following last year’s student riots, is a clear indicator of a deeper problem.
It doesn’t justify what they’re doing - such violence and destruction is completely and utterly wrong. However that doesn’t make it any less inevitable.
Windows 8 does look good. But I’d be lying if I said that the sight of legacy Windows wasn’t as jarring as being approached by someone hot, only to be asked if you might be interested in their hideous, fat friend.